banner



Home  ›  Which Field Of Study Focuses On The Adaptive Behaviors Of Animal Species In Natural Contexts?

Which Field Of Study Focuses On The Adaptive Behaviors Of Animal Species In Natural Contexts?

Written By Monday, June 27, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Scientific objective study of animal behaviour

A range of animal behaviours

Modify in behavior in lizards throughout natural selection

Ethology is the scientific written report of animal behaviour, unremarkably with a focus on behaviour under natural weather, and viewing behaviour every bit an evolutionarily adaptive trait.[ane] Behaviourism as a term likewise describes the scientific and objective study of animal behaviour, usually referring to measured responses to stimuli or to trained behavioural responses in a laboratory context, without a item emphasis on evolutionary adaptivity.[two] Throughout history, dissimilar naturalists have studied aspects of beast behaviour. Ethology has its scientific roots in the piece of work of Charles Darwin and of American and German ornithologists of the late 19th and early 20th century,[ commendation needed ] including Charles O. Whitman, Oskar Heinroth, and Wallace Craig. The mod bailiwick of ethology is more often than not considered to have begun during the 1930s with the work of Dutch biologist Nikolaas Tinbergen and Austrian biologists Konrad Lorenz and Karl von Frisch, the three recipients of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.[three] Ethology combines laboratory and field science, with a stiff relation to another disciplines such as neuroanatomy, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Ethologists typically testify interest in a behavioural process rather than in a particular beast group,[4] and often study ane blazon of behaviour, such equally assailment, in a number of unrelated species.

Ethology is a rapidly growing field. Since the dawn of the 21st century researchers have re-examined and reached new conclusions in many aspects of animal communication, emotions, civilisation, learning and sexuality that the scientific community long idea it understood. New fields, such equally neuroethology, accept adult.

Understanding ethology or animal behaviour tin be of import in animal training. Because the natural behaviours of dissimilar species or breeds enables trainers to select the individuals best suited to perform the required chore. It as well enables trainers to encourage the performance of naturally occurring behaviours and the discontinuance of undesirable behaviours.[5]

Etymology [edit]

The term ethology derives from the Greek language: ἦθος, ethos pregnant "character" and -λογία , -logia meaning "the written report of". The term was starting time popularized by American myrmecologist (a person who studies ants) William Morton Wheeler in 1902.[half-dozen]

History [edit]

The beginnings of ethology [edit]

Charles Darwin (1809–1882) explored the expression of emotions in animals.

Because ethology is considered a topic of biology, ethologists have been concerned particularly with the evolution of behaviour and its understanding in terms of natural selection. In one sense, the beginning mod ethologist was Charles Darwin, whose 1872 book The Expression of the Emotions in Human being and Animals influenced many ethologists. He pursued his interest in behaviour by encouraging his protégé George Romanes, who investigated brute learning and intelligence using an anthropomorphic method, anecdotal cognitivism, that did non gain scientific support.[7]

Other early ethologists, such as Eugène Marais, Charles O. Whitman, Oskar Heinroth, Wallace Craig and Julian Huxley, instead concentrated on behaviours that can be called instinctive, or natural, in that they occur in all members of a species under specified circumstances. Their kickoff for studying the behaviour of a new species was to construct an ethogram (a clarification of the chief types of behaviour with their frequencies of occurrence). This provided an objective, cumulative database of behaviour, which subsequent researchers could check and supplement.[6]

Growth of the field [edit]

Due to the work of Konrad Lorenz and Niko Tinbergen, ethology developed strongly in continental Europe during the years prior to World War Two.[half-dozen] After the war, Tinbergen moved to the Academy of Oxford, and ethology became stronger in the Britain, with the additional influence of William Thorpe, Robert Hinde, and Patrick Bateson at the Sub-department of Animal Behaviour of the University of Cambridge.[8] In this period, too, ethology began to develop strongly in North America.

Lorenz, Tinbergen, and von Frisch were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1973 for their work of developing ethology.[9]

Ethology is now a well-recognized scientific discipline, and has a number of journals covering developments in the subject, such every bit Brute Behaviour, Beast Welfare, Applied Creature Behaviour Science, Animal Cognition, Behaviour, Behavioral Ecology and Ethology: International Journal of Behavioural Biological science. In 1972, the International Society for Human Ethology was founded to promote substitution of knowledge and opinions concerning human behaviour gained by applying ethological principles and methods and published their journal, The Human Ethology Bulletin. In 2008, in a newspaper published in the journal Behaviour, ethologist Peter Verbeek introduced the term "Peace Ethology" as a sub-subject field of Human Ethology that is concerned with issues of human disharmonize, conflict resolution, reconciliation, war, peacemaking, and peacekeeping behaviour.[10]

Social ethology and recent developments [edit]

In 1972, the English ethologist John H. Crook distinguished comparative ethology from social ethology, and argued that much of the ethology that had existed so far was really comparative ethology—examining animals every bit individuals—whereas, in the time to come, ethologists would need to concentrate on the behaviour of social groups of animals and the social structure within them.[11]

E. O. Wilson's book Sociobiology: The New Synthesis appeared in 1975,[12] and since that time, the written report of behaviour has been much more concerned with social aspects. It has also been driven past the stronger, merely more sophisticated, Darwinism associated with Wilson, Robert Trivers, and W. D. Hamilton. The related evolution of behavioural ecology has also helped transform ethology.[13] Furthermore, a substantial rapprochement with comparative psychology has occurred, then the modern scientific study of behaviour offers a more than or less seamless spectrum of approaches: from animal noesis to more traditional comparative psychology, ethology, sociobiology, and behavioural ecology. In 2020, Dr. Tobias Starzak and Professor Albert Newen from the Institute of Philosophy Two at the Ruhr Academy Bochum postulated that animals may have beliefs.[14]

Human relationship with comparative psychology [edit]

Comparative psychology besides studies brute behaviour, simply, equally opposed to ethology, is construed equally a sub-topic of psychology rather than equally ane of biology. Historically, where comparative psychology has included enquiry on animal behaviour in the context of what is known near human being psychology, ethology involves enquiry on animate being behaviour in the context of what is known nearly animal anatomy, physiology, neurobiology, and phylogenetic history. Furthermore, early on comparative psychologists full-bodied on the study of learning and tended to research behaviour in artificial situations, whereas early ethologists concentrated on behaviour in natural situations, tending to describe it as instinctive.

The two approaches are complementary rather than competitive, only they do effect in dissimilar perspectives, and occasionally conflicts of opinion about matters of substance. In addition, for most of the twentieth century, comparative psychology developed most strongly in Due north America, while ethology was stronger in Europe. From a practical standpoint, early comparative psychologists concentrated on gaining extensive knowledge of the behaviour of very few species. Ethologists were more than interested in understanding behaviour across a wide range of species to facilitate principled comparisons across taxonomic groups. Ethologists have made much more than use of such cross-species comparisons than comparative psychologists take.

Instinct [edit]

Kelp gull chicks peck at red spot on female parent's bill to stimulate regurgitating reflex

The Merriam-Webster lexicon defines instinct as "A largely inheritable and unalterable tendency of an organism to make a complex and specific response to environmental stimuli without involving reason".[15]

Stock-still activity patterns [edit]

An important development, associated with the proper noun of Konrad Lorenz though probably due more to his teacher, Oskar Heinroth, was the identification of fixed action patterns. Lorenz popularized these every bit instinctive responses that would occur reliably in the presence of identifiable stimuli called sign stimuli or "releasing stimuli". Fixed activity patterns are now considered to exist instinctive behavioural sequences that are relatively invariant within the species and that almost inevitably run to completion.[xvi]

One example of a releaser is the beak movements of many bird species performed by newly hatched chicks, which stimulates the mother to regurgitate food for her offspring.[17] Other examples are the classic studies by Tinbergen on the egg-retrieval behaviour and the effects of a "supernormal stimulus" on the behaviour of graylag geese.[18] [nineteen]

One investigation of this kind was the study of the waggle dance ("dance language") in bee communication by Karl von Frisch.[20]

Learning [edit]

Habituation [edit]

Habituation is a simple form of learning and occurs in many animal taxa. It is the procedure whereby an creature ceases responding to a stimulus. Often, the response is an innate behaviour. Essentially, the creature learns not to answer to irrelevant stimuli. For example, prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) give alarm calls when predators approach, causing all individuals in the group to quickly scramble down burrows. When prairie dog towns are located nigh trails used by humans, giving alert calls every fourth dimension a person walks by is expensive in terms of time and free energy. Habituation to humans is therefore an of import adaptation in this context.[21] [22] [23]

Associative learning [edit]

Associative learning in animal behaviour is any learning procedure in which a new response becomes associated with a particular stimulus.[24] The showtime studies of associative learning were made past Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov, who observed that dogs trained to associate food with the ringing of a bell would salivate on hearing the bell.[25]

Imprinting [edit]

Imprinting enables the young to discriminate the members of their own species, vital for reproductive success. This important blazon of learning only takes place in a very express period of time. Konrad Lorenz observed that the young of birds such as geese and chickens followed their mothers spontaneously from near the offset day later they were hatched, and he discovered that this response could be imitated past an arbitrary stimulus if the eggs were incubated artificially and the stimulus were presented during a critical period that continued for a few days afterward hatching.[26]

Cultural learning [edit]

Observational learning [edit]

Imitation [edit]

Simulated is an advanced behaviour whereby an brute observes and exactly replicates the behaviour of another. The National Institutes of Health reported that capuchin monkeys preferred the visitor of researchers who imitated them to that of researchers who did not. The monkeys not just spent more time with their imitators but also preferred to appoint in a simple task with them fifty-fifty when provided with the option of performing the same task with a non-imitator.[27] Imitation has been observed in recent research on chimpanzees; non only did these chimps copy the actions of another individual, when given a choice, the chimps preferred to imitate the actions of the higher-ranking elder chimpanzee every bit opposed to the lower-ranking young chimpanzee.[28]

Stimulus and local enhancement [edit]

There are various ways animals can acquire using observational learning merely without the process of imitation. One of these is stimulus enhancement in which individuals become interested in an object as the event of observing others interacting with the object.[29] Increased interest in an object can result in object manipulation which allows for new object-related behaviours by trial-and-fault learning. Haggerty (1909) devised an experiment in which a monkey climbed upwards the side of a cage, placed its arm into a wooden chute, and pulled a rope in the chute to release food. Another monkey was provided an opportunity to obtain the food after watching a monkey get through this process on four occasions. The monkey performed a unlike method and finally succeeded later on trial-and-error.[30] Another example familiar to some cat and dog owners is the ability of their animals to open up doors. The activeness of humans operating the handle to open the door results in the animals becoming interested in the handle then by trial-and-error, they learn to operate the handle and open up the door.

In local enhancement, a demonstrator attracts an observer'south attention to a item location.[31] Local enhancement has been observed to transmit foraging information among birds, rats and pigs.[32] The stingless bee (Trigona corvina) uses local enhancement to locate other members of their colony and food resources.[33]

[edit]

A well-documented case of social transmission of a behaviour occurred in a grouping of macaques on Hachijojima Isle, Japan. The macaques lived in the inland woods until the 1960s, when a group of researchers started giving them potatoes on the embankment: soon, they started venturing onto the embankment, picking the potatoes from the sand, and cleaning and eating them.[12] About one yr subsequently, an private was observed bringing a white potato to the sea, putting information technology into the water with one hand, and cleaning information technology with the other. This behaviour was soon expressed by the individuals living in contact with her; when they gave birth, this behaviour was as well expressed by their young - a grade of social transmission.[34]

Teaching [edit]

Teaching is a highly specialized aspect of learning in which the "teacher" (demonstrator) adjusts their behaviour to increment the probability of the "pupil" (observer) achieving the desired end-result of the behaviour. For example, orcas are known to intentionally embankment themselves to catch pinniped prey.[35] Mother orcas teach their young to take hold of pinnipeds by pushing them onto the shore and encouraging them to attack the prey. Because the mother orca is altering her behaviour to help her offspring acquire to catch prey, this is evidence of teaching.[35] Teaching is not limited to mammals. Many insects, for example, have been observed demonstrating diverse forms of teaching to obtain nutrient. Ants, for example, volition guide each other to food sources through a process called "tandem running," in which an ant will guide a companion ant to a source of nutrient.[36] It has been suggested that the pupil ant is able to learn this route to obtain food in the future or teach the road to other ants. This behaviour of teaching is also exemplified past crows, specifically New Caledonian crows. The adults (whether private or in families) teach their young adolescent offspring how to construct and employ tools. For example, Pandanus branches are used to extract insects and other larvae from holes within trees.[37]

Mating and the fight for supremacy [edit]

Individual reproduction is the most important phase in the proliferation of individuals or genes within a species: for this reason, in that location exist complex mating rituals, which can exist very complex even if they are frequently regarded as fixed action patterns. The stickleback's circuitous mating ritual, studied by Tinbergen, is regarded as a notable instance.[38]

Often in social life, animals fight for the right to reproduce, as well as social supremacy. A mutual example of fighting for social and sexual supremacy is the so-chosen pecking order among poultry. Every time a grouping of poultry cohabitate for a sure fourth dimension length, they establish a pecking order. In these groups, one craven dominates the others and can peck without beingness pecked. A second chicken tin can peck all the others except the showtime, and and so on. Chickens higher in the pecking order may at times be distinguished by their healthier appearance when compared to lower level chickens.[ citation needed ] While the pecking order is establishing, frequent and trigger-happy fights tin happen, but once established, it is cleaved only when other individuals enter the grouping, in which case the pecking order re-establishes from scratch.[39]

Living in groups [edit]

Several animal species, including humans, tend to live in groups. Group size is a major aspect of their social surroundings. Social life is probably a complex and constructive survival strategy. Information technology may exist regarded as a sort of symbiosis among individuals of the same species: a society is composed of a group of individuals belonging to the same species living within well-defined rules on nutrient management, role assignments and reciprocal dependence.

When biologists interested in evolution theory showtime started examining social behaviour, some obviously unanswerable questions arose, such as how the nativity of sterile castes, like in bees, could be explained through an evolving mechanism that emphasizes the reproductive success of as many individuals as possible, or why, amidst animals living in small groups like squirrels, an individual would risk its own life to save the rest of the group. These behaviours may be examples of altruism.[40] Of form, not all behaviours are altruistic, equally indicated by the table below. For example, revengeful behaviour was at i point claimed to accept been observed exclusively in Human sapiens. All the same, other species have been reported to be vengeful including chimpanzees,[41] as well as anecdotal reports of vengeful camels.[42]

Classification of social behaviours[ citation needed ]
Blazon of behaviour Effect on the donor Issue on the receiver
Egoistic Neutral to Increases fettle Decreases fettle
Cooperative Neutral to Increases fitness Neutral to Increases fitness
Altruistic Decreases fettle Neutral to Increases fitness
Revengeful Decreases fettle Decreases fitness

Donating behaviour has been explained by the cistron-centred view of development.[43] [44]

Benefits and costs of group living [edit]

I reward of group living tin be decreased predation. If the number of predator attacks stays the same despite increasing prey group size, each prey may take a reduced chance of predator attacks through the dilution effect.[xiii] [ folio needed ] Farther, according to the selfish herd theory, the fettle benefits associated with group living vary depending on the location of an individual inside the group. The theory suggests that conspecifics positioned at the centre of a group will reduce the likelihood predations while those at the periphery will get more vulnerable to attack.[45] Additionally, a predator that is confused by a mass of individuals can find it more difficult to single out i target. For this reason, the zebra'southward stripes offer non but camouflage in a habitat of tall grasses, only also the reward of blending into a herd of other zebras.[46] In groups, casualty can also actively reduce their predation risk through more effective defence tactics, or through earlier detection of predators through increased vigilance.[thirteen]

Another reward of group living can exist an increased ability to forage for food. Grouping members may commutation information about food sources betwixt one another, facilitating the procedure of resource location.[13] [ page needed ] Honeybees are a notable example of this, using the waggle trip the light fantastic to communicate the location of flowers to the rest of their hive.[47] Predators also receive benefits from hunting in groups, through using better strategies and existence able to take down larger casualty.[xiii] [ page needed ]

Some disadvantages accompany living in groups. Living in close proximity to other animals tin can facilitate the manual of parasites and affliction, and groups that are likewise big may also experience greater competition for resources and mates.[48]

Group size [edit]

Theoretically, social animals should accept optimal group sizes that maximize the benefits and minimize the costs of group living. Even so, in nature, most groups are stable at slightly larger than optimal sizes.[xiii] [ folio needed ] Because information technology generally benefits an private to bring together an optimally-sized grouping, despite slightly decreasing the advantage for all members, groups may continue to increase in size until information technology is more advantageous to remain lonely than to join an overly total grouping.[49]

Tinbergen's four questions for ethologists [edit]

Niko Tinbergen argued that ethology always needed to include iv kinds of explanation in whatever instance of behaviour:[50] [51]

  • Function – How does the behaviour affect the animal'due south chances of survival and reproduction? Why does the animal respond that way instead of some other way?
  • Causation – What are the stimuli that arm-twist the response, and how has it been modified past recent learning?
  • Evolution – How does the behaviour change with age, and what early experiences are necessary for the beast to brandish the behaviour?
  • Evolutionary history – How does the behaviour compare with like behaviour in related species, and how might it take begun through the process of phylogeny?

These explanations are complementary rather than mutually exclusive—all instances of behaviour require an explanation at each of these four levels. For case, the function of eating is to acquire nutrients (which ultimately aids survival and reproduction), but the immediate cause of eating is hunger (causation). Hunger and eating are evolutionarily ancient and are establish in many species (evolutionary history), and develop early on inside an organism's lifespan (development). Information technology is easy to confuse such questions—for example, to fence that people eat because they're hungry and not to acquire nutrients—without realizing that the reason people feel hunger is because information technology causes them to acquire nutrients.[52]

See also [edit]

  • Anthrozoology
  • Behavioral ecology
  • Cognitive ethology
  • Deception in animals
  • Human ethology
  • List of aberrant behaviours in animals

References [edit]

  1. ^ "Definition of ethology". Merriam-Webster . Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  2. ^ "Definition of behaviorism". Merriam-Webster . Retrieved nine September 2016.
    "Behaviourism". Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  3. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1973". Nobelprize.org . Retrieved 9 September 2016. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1973 was awarded jointly to Karl von Frisch, Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen 'for their discoveries concerning arrangement and elicitation of individual and social behaviour patterns'.
  4. ^ Gomez-Marin, Alex; Paton, Joseph J; Kampff, Adam R; Costa, Rui Yard; Mainen, Zachary F (28 October 2014). "Large behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience" (PDF). Nature Neuroscience. 17 (11): 1455–1462. doi:x.1038/nn.3812. ISSN 1097-6256. PMID 25349912. S2CID 10300952.
  5. ^ McGreevy, Paul; Boakes, Robert (2011). Carrots and Sticks: Principles of Brute Training. Darlington Printing. pp. xi–23. ISBN978-1-921364-15-0 . Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  6. ^ a b c Matthews, Janice R.; Matthews, Robert West. (2009). Insect Behaviour. Springer. p. thirteen. ISBN978-xc-481-2388-9.
  7. ^ Keeley, Brian L. (2004). "Anthropomorphism, primatomorphism, mammalomorphism: understanding cross-species comparisons" (PDF). York University. p. 527. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 December 2008. Retrieved 19 Dec 2008.
  8. ^ Bateson, Patrick (1991). The Development and Integration of Behaviour: Essays in Award of Robert Hinde. Cambridge University Printing. p. 479. ISBN978-0-521-40709-0.
  9. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica (1975). Yearbook of science and the futurity . p. 248. ISBN9780852293072.
  10. ^ Verbeek, Peter (2008). "Peace Ethology". Behaviour. 145 (xi): 1497–1524. doi:ten.1163/156853908786131270.
  11. ^ Crook, John H.; Goss-Custard, J. D. (1972). "Social Ethology". Annual Review of Psychology. 23 (1): 277–312. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.001425.
  12. ^ a b Wilson, Edward O. (2000). Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press. p. 170. ISBN978-0-674-00089-6.
  13. ^ a b c d e f Davies, Nicholas B.; Krebs, John R.; W, Stuart A. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (quaternary ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN978-1-4443-3949-nine.
  14. ^ "What information technology ways when animals have behavior". ScienceDaily. 17 June 2020. Retrieved xviii June 2020.
  15. ^ "Instinct". Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
  16. ^ Campbell, North. A. (1996). "Chapter l". Biology (iv ed.). Benjamin Cummings, New York. ISBN978-0-8053-1957-6.
  17. ^ Bernstein, Westward. Thou. (2011). A Basic Theory of Neuropsychoanalysis. Karnac Books. p. 81. ISBN978-i-85575-809-4.
  18. ^ Tinbergen, Niko (1951). The Study of Instinct. Oxford University Press, New York.
  19. ^ Tinbergen, Niko (1953). The Herring Gull'south Earth. Collins, London.
  20. ^ Buchmann, Stephen (2006). Letters from the Hive: An Intimate History of Bees, Honey, and Humankind. Random Firm of Canada. p. 105. ISBN978-0-553-38266-2.
  21. ^ Breed, M. D. (2001). "Habituation". Retrieved 9 September 2014.
  22. ^ Keil, Frank C.; Wilson, Robert Andrew (2001). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences . MIT Press. p. 184. ISBN978-0-262-73144-7.
  23. ^ Bouton, One thousand. E. (2007). Learning and behavior: A contemporary synthesis. Sunderland. Archived from the original on 31 Baronial 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  24. ^ "Associative learning". Encyclopædia Britannica . Retrieved ix September 2014.
  25. ^ Hudmon, Andrew (2005). Learning and memory . Infobase Publishing. p. 35. ISBN978-0-7910-8638-four.
  26. ^ Mercer, Jean (2006). Agreement attachment: parenting, child care, and emotional development. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 19. ISBN978-0-275-98217-i.
  27. ^ "Imitation Promotes Social Bonding in Primates, August thirteen, 2009 News Release". National Institutes of Health. xiii Baronial 2009. Archived from the original on 22 August 2009. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  28. ^ Horner, Victoria; et al. (19 May 2010). "Prestige Affects Cultural Learning in Chimpanzees". PLOS ONE. 5 (5): e10625. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510625H. doi:ten.1371/journal.pone.0010625. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC2873264. PMID 20502702.
  29. ^ Spence, K. W. (1937). "Experimental studies of learning and higher mental processes in infra-human being primates". Psychological Bulletin. 34 (x): 806–850. doi:10.1037/h0061498.
  30. ^ Haggerty, M. E. (1909). "Imitation in monkeys". Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology. 19 (4): 337–455. doi:10.1002/cne.920190402.
  31. ^ Hoppitt, Due west.; Laland, K. N. (2013). Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models. Princeton Academy Press. ISBN978-1-4008-4650-four.
  32. ^ Galef, B. G.; Giraldeau, L.-A. (2001). "Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: Causal mechanisms and adaptive functions". Animal Behaviour. 61 (one): iii–15. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1557. PMID 11170692. S2CID 38321280.
  33. ^ F.M.J. Sommerlandt; Due west. Huber; J. Spaethe (2014). "Social information in the Stingless Bee, Trigona corvina Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Apidae): The apply of visual and olfactory cues at the food site". Sociobiology. 61 (4): 401–406. doi:ten.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.401-406. ISSN 0361-6525.
  34. ^ "Japanese Macaque - Macaca fuscata". Blueplanetbiomes.org. Retrieved 8 November 2011.
  35. ^ a b Rendell, Luke; Whitehead, Hal (2001). "Culture in whales and dolphins" (PDF). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24 (2): 309–324. doi:ten.1017/s0140525x0100396x. PMID 11530544. S2CID 24052064.
  36. ^ Hoppitt, W. J.; Dark-brown, G. R.; Kendal, R.; Rendell, L.; Thornton, A.; Webster, Thousand. M.; Laland, K. N. (2008). "Lessons from animate being teaching". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 23 (9): 486–93. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.008. PMID 18657877.
  37. ^ Rutz, Christian; Bluff, Lucas A.; Reed, Nicola; Troscianko, Jolyon; Newton, Jason; Inger, Richard; Kacelnik, Alex; Bearhop, Stuart (September 2010). "The Ecological Significance of Tool Use in New Caledonian Crows". Scientific discipline. 329 (5998): 1523–1526. Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1523R. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.1192053. PMID 20847272. S2CID 8888382.
  38. ^ Tinbergen, Niko; Van Iersel, J. J. A. (1947). "'Deportation Reactions' in the Three-Spined Stickleback". Behaviour. 1 (1): 56–63. doi:x.1163/156853948X00038. JSTOR 4532675.
  39. ^ Rajecki, D. W. (1988). "Germination of jump orders in pairs of male domestic chickens". Aggressive Beliefs. xiv (vi): 425–436. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:six<425::Aid-AB2480140604>3.0.CO;2-#. S2CID 141664966.
  40. ^ Cummings, Marker; Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn; Iannotti, Ronald (1991). Altruism and aggression: biological and social origins . Cambridge University Printing. p. 7. ISBN978-0-521-42367-0.
  41. ^ McCullough, Michael Eastward. (2008). Beyond Revenge: The Evolution of the Forgiveness Instinct. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 79–80. ISBN978-0-470-26215-3.
  42. ^ De Waal, Frans (2001). The Ape and the Sushi Master: Cultural Reflections by a Primatologist . Basic Books. p. 338. ISBN978-0-465-04176-iii . Retrieved 27 December 2016.
  43. ^ Dawkins, Richard (January 1979). "Twelve Misunderstandings of Kin Pick". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 51 (2): 184–200. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00682.x.
  44. ^ Ågren, J. Arvid (2016). "Selfish genetic elements and the gene's-eye view of evolution". Electric current Zoology. 62 (6): 659–665. doi:10.1093/cz/zow102. ISSN 1674-5507. PMC5804262. PMID 29491953.
  45. ^ Hamilton, Due west. D. (1971). "Geometry for the Selfish Herd". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 31 (2): 295–311. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-five. PMID 5104951.
  46. ^ "How practise a zebra's stripes act every bit camouflage?". HowStuffWorks.com. 15 April 2008. Retrieved 26 Dec 2016.
  47. ^ Riley, J.; Greggers, U.; Smith, A.; Reynolds, D. R.; Menzel, R. (2005). "The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle trip the light fantastic toe". Nature. 435 (7039): 205–207. Bibcode:2005Natur.435..205R. doi:10.1038/nature03526. PMID 15889092. S2CID 4413962.
  48. ^ Rathads, Triana (29 August 2007). "A Look at Brute Social Groups". Science 360. Archived from the original on viii May 2014. Retrieved 22 April 2014.
  49. ^ Sibley, R. M. (1983). "Optimal group size is unstable". Animate being Behaviour. 31 (3): 947–948. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(83)80250-4. S2CID 54387192.
  50. ^ Tinbergen, Niko (1963). "On aims and methods in ethology". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 20 (4): 410–433. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.10.
  51. ^ MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A. (27 July 2011). "The levels of assay revisited". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Club B: Biological Sciences. 366 (1574): 2076–2085. doi:ten.1098/rstb.2010.0363. PMC3130367. PMID 21690126.
  52. ^ Barrett et al. (2002) Human Evolutionary Psychology. Princeton University Press.

Farther reading [edit]

  • Burkhardt, Richard West. Jr. "On the Emergence of Ethology equally a Science." Conspectus of History ane.7 (1981).

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethology#:~:text=Ethology%20is%20the%20scientific%20study,as%20an%20evolutionarily%20adaptive%20trait.

Posted by: arellanoexproul.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Which Field Of Study Focuses On The Adaptive Behaviors Of Animal Species In Natural Contexts?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel